Imaginative renditions of
classic cocktails and heightened service levels formalise the experience
further. My companions - Chris from All Things Meaty, @scouserachel on Blonde duties and her friend Hannah, were therefore reasonably excited and hopeful.
Food comes as a five-course tasting menu for £47.
Theoretically, this appears quite reasonable compared to others especially with
their starry reputation. And some finer dining is certainly welcome in these
parts. But as we embarked upon the meal, it quickly unravelled.
Radishes with black sesame seeds and gochuchang (Korean
mayo) were dramatic enough in presentation. The premise to dip in mayo and then
the sesame seeds would stick, I suppose. However the radishes weren’t particularly
flavourful and the mayo even less so. I’m not sure how anything could be less
Korean-tasting.
Buttermilk fried chicken thigh pieces in basket of pine
needles and cones. Dainty enough, and cheap so surely a reasonable portion
size? Wrong, it was absolutely miserly. Thigh is cheap too. The apparent ‘pine
salt’ was absent upon tasting, so this was basically a lone bite of posh KFC
popcorn chicken in a basket of Christmas tat. It tasted fine as most freshly
fried chicken does, but was another (and not the last) Emperor’s New Clothes
dish of the night.
Onto the clanger of the night. And even with the above dishes,
it did get worse. Enter stage left a massive plate of fennel, with a rancid
topping of purple seaweed and the odd walnut. The fennel was steamed but with
little seasoning. The seaweed wasn’t a delicate addition of marine flavour, but
that of a rotten beach. Possibly with a week-old whale carcass astride it, encircled by carrion feeders and covered in bird shit.
Swiftly looking forward after our table of four unanimously decried
the fennel course as ‘total bollocks’, the leek and mussels course wasn’t too
different. Yes it had smoked mussels dotted about, but we could not escape the
feeling that this was one massive (cheap) steamed veg plate after another. The
leek was in its entirety, so the outer layer was an obstacle. For the two
diners in our group not eating shellfish, some mini pickled onions were added. Again, a disappointing show of austerity and
blandness.
Rib of beef was delicious. To be clear here, I wanted to
like The Clove Club. I walked in with no prejudices or grudges, and I have no ideological hipster or age issues; I probably am a hipster by varying
definitions. So this isn’t a hatchet job (or a predetermined one anyway).
It genuinely was a fantastic dish. The beef was exquisitely
cooked, the potato batons were fantastic although predictably sparse, and the
juices were meaty and full of flavour. A larger dish of that and a rework of
the menu concept would have people coming back to eat. I’d be keen to see how
many return visitors they get, and how quickly the menu is rewritten.
Desserts were very good; blood orange is never a bad thing
and the seasonal badge of honour remains intact. It was served alongside sheep’s
milk mousse and more bloody fennel. Perhaps a cruel joke.
Another mousse (more Masterchef shenanigans) was great –
ginger this time, adding some long overdue heat to the sweetness and acid from
the ‘warm cider’.
Finally there was a chicory tea cake which we were almost
denied. It was given as if a freebie, although it was on the menu. To be
honest, we didn’t give a fuck by this point. Speculation was rife about snacks
to follow, or even a Meat Mission trip…
The meal did progressively improve, granted but if you serve
a trio of starters and two terrible courses, by that point your diners are
despondent and disinterested. The beef picked us back up, with some seriously
tasty desserts to support that, but then the bill comes along, slaps you in the
face and holds that mirror up to your mug-inscribed reflection.
We declined the offer to buy some off-menu cheese,
at a hefty surcharge. Wise at this point, just like clockwork we sat back and observed pitiful portions being conveyed off to some other less sceptical mugs. Nothing more than
upselling.
I have no idea what this was. Experimentation? Kitchen
skills A-Z? A midnight allotment ransacking? I don’t need a concept or direction (although I’m sure some abstract
nonsense exists in a PR somewhere) – but I didn’t understand this at all, and
some cohesion would provide some context. There was no zing, or spice,
or richness, or seasoning, or frankly any excitement in any way.
The
clientele, haircuts and tailoring are not what’s wrong with this place, nor is
the space or technique. It’s the onanistic boys’ club menu concerned more with
culinary adventures than with taste.
Food – 4/10
Drink – 9/10
Service - 7/10
Value – 5/10
Tap water tales – 5/10 (filtered charged nominally, but sparkling too)
Staff Hotness – 8/10 - our watiress was pretty and friendly. Front of house and bar staff are very natty.
No comments:
Post a Comment